Post by scrumpy on Jan 14, 2015 13:48:59 GMT
Last updated 2/13/2015
articanus words the one about annoying changes perfectly:
This is exactly what should be avoided.
More later.
- Every character will be given good offensive and defensive tools.
- Every tool or strategy has to be counter-able. Sure, every character is going to be broken, but, if something is too good, it's no fun to play against.
- No move will be left useless.
- No character will be forced to revolve around a single strategy
- Stop suggesting that everyone get a shine.
- Imagine playing against your buffs before suggesting them. If it sounds horrible, it probably isn't a good idea. There is no reason to add any controller throwers to the game.
- Make sure there's at least some sort of reason to buff a character in the way in which you buff them, especially with low-tier characters. "Why not?" seems to often lead to arbitrary, unfun buffs that don't really make much sense and leave the character as unchanged but with one strange gimmick.
- When proposing changes, it is recommended that your changes be creative rather than dull hotfixes that don't really add much depth.
- If you're going to propose changes, make sure you know what you're talking about.
articanus words the one about annoying changes perfectly:
[...]it just makes edgeguarding more difficult. This takes the brokenness out of the hands of the user and overall creates an "annoyance" more than actually increasing the strength of the character, much less creating depth for her playstyle.
This is exactly what should be avoided.
More later.
